Alex Sidorenko from RISK-ACADEMY shares his views on what does ERM means to him and how the term has been way overused :))
At RISK-ACADEMY we have compiled free videos of lectures, seminars and interviews with Russian risk managers, as well as free templates and examples of the tools required for the implementation of elements of risk management in the organization of small and medium-sized businesses.
Learn more about integrating risk management into decision making, planning and performance management: https://www.udemy.com/course/1687492/
Download the #1 risk management book in the world: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323254437_FREE_RISK_MANAGEMENT_BOOK_GUIDE_TO_EFFECTIVE_RISK_MANAGEMENT_30
Some of the best risk management training courses focusing on decision making, cognitive biases, ERM, risk modeling: https://riskacademy.blog/product/risk-managers-training/
Check out other risk management books
Join the discussion with global risk management experts on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/1834592/
Prefer audio or podcasts? We have you sorted: https://soundcloud.com/riskacademy
MUST read for all risk managers in non-financial companies: https://riskacademy.blog/category/hot/
Check out other decision making books
RISK-ACADEMY offers online courses
ISO31000 Integrating Risk Management
Alex Sidorenko, known for his risk management blog http://www.riskacademy.blog, has created a 25-step program to integrate risk management into decision making, core business processes and the overall culture of the organization.
What should be the basis for classifying the impact ranges if you don’t have operational risk impact database when starting the exercise in a new company?? Can we get some help from external auditor’s materiality level? Highly appreciate if you could guide me on that.
First, for good risk management, you don’t need impact ranges most of the time, you need to understand volatility of assumptions. Big difference. Second you don’t need an operational risk impact database
My query was with respect to RM1 to satisfy auditors. So what should be the basis of impact ranges to satisfy auditors while working separately on RM2 in a new organization?
That’s easy. Anything. Auditors wouldn’t understand or care as long as it’s relatively sensible. Could be group of experts or any external verifiable source or a little internal stats which always exist if you look hard enough
Thanks a lot for your prompt responses. Highly appreciate it.